What is the relationship between the electives students choose and the results of their career aptitude testing instrument?
Why do students choose certain electives? Is the program of studies easy to use?
Goals and objectives:
The goal of this research is to make it easier and more effective for students to choose electives. These electives might impact the rest of their lives.
Activities:
Survey students, counselors, and other key players in the creation of the program of studies and course selection.
Resources: The use of survey’s from students, counselors and principals. Other schools will be asked how they handle the course selection and the making of schedules for students. The use of 4-year plans will be researched through the Internet and asking other schools about their practices.
Internet, student and counselor survey’s, software
Timeline: see attached document 7.1* attached below Part 3 assignment
Persons responsible: Allene Pennington, David Berrier (CTE Director) and Vanessa Harry (lead counselor)
Process for monitoring: After course selection monitor program for ease of use by students, teachers, and counselors.
Assessment: compare the selection to last years and make adjustment for future years
1. Examining the work: Setting the Foundation-
Many students do not choose electives according to their future career aspirations. They are given a program of studies (book with all of the course selections) which many do not look at or share with their parents. Each student is given a skills and aptitude test that identifies their interest for future careers. The problem is that the students do not use this information when choosing electives. The question is what we (as a school) can do to make the choice of electives easier and more beneficial for the students.
2. Analyzing data-
Student schedule changes are quite prevalent. The number of changes will be compiled by the counselors. Many students do not turn in their course selection card and are randomly assigned courses. Students do not choose electives according to their career test results.
3. Developing deeper understanding-
Additional information will given by the counselors, the CTE director and Bridget Winstead (SASI expert) to decide what the issues are and what issues need resolving. A questionnaire will be given to the students to develop a more efficient course elective process. The electives should correspond to the student’s 4-year plan.
4. Engaging in Self-Reflection-
At this time I do not have all the resources needed to really make the changes needed. I will have to get buy in from some very key players within the campus. This may be very difficult and may take increment changes that are less dramatic than what is being proposed.
5. Exploring Programmatic Patterns –
There could be some problems in developing a course selection according to career testing. Many students may want to take programs like AVID and ROTC and these may not be identified by the testing tool. A resolution for special programs will need to be developed before implementing a new course selection tool.
6. Determining direction-
At this time the direction is still taking shape. The more I think about the scope of the issue the more daunting it becomes.
7. Taking action for school improvement- Completed chart 7.1 on next page.
8. Sustaining improvement –
The nominal group setting will be used to evaluate the new course selection process. The group will consist of the counselors, CTE Director, CTE Coordinator, and Allene Pennington. There should be a debriefing and suggestions for further improvement.
The revamping of the course/elective choice procedure can possibly ruffle quite a few feathers. The first step is to get the backing of the CTE department since it can impact them greatly. The counselors are who could possibly become the most resistant to change. They have used the same process for course selection for ten years and it does seem to work but is slowly becoming inadequate. The principal is the third person to get on board. She will need to have input into the topic and keep abreast of all changes in the system. The fourth person will be our SASI Aid because she works with the new system and has the most experience with process. The above order is not necessarily the correct order because getting the SASI Aid on board first is probably going to make it the most successful. The above persons on a committee would make it the most successful. During the committee meeting I would discuss the reason for choosing the change in course selection and the logic behind choice overload. The committee meeting would conclude with some ideas that would incrementally change the system. Time would also be allowed for brainstorming more ways to improve the system.